The State of Nature is a Myth

by Michel Lussault

Interview first published in French in the journal Rhizome, 2022.


Rhizome: How do you define the Anthropocene?

Michel Lussault: This neologism is coined from the term “anthropos”, i.e. the generic human being, and “cene”, deriving from Kainos, which means “new”, in this case in the sense of a new geological period: the “period of the human”.

It was Paul Josef Crutzen[1] who proposed this concept at the turn of the 21st century to show that, due to the impact of human activities on planetary biophysical systems, human beings have become a “force of nature” of comparable importance to geological forces. In other words, human activities and their effects are so massive and far-reaching that all of the planet’s biological and physical systems are “forced.” These powerful “anthropogenic forcings” cause an accelerated evolution of planetary bioclimatic conditions by triggering numerous feedback loops between all of the various components of the Earth system. These are comparable in importance to the non-anthropogenic bioclimatic evolutions that have existed in the geological history of the planet, but therefore differ in their origin, and above all in their rapidity. Indeed, the geological history of Earth has experienced, for example, very significant temperature changes over tens of thousands of years,[2] whose origins were linked to fluctuations in the motion of the planet and its axial inclination. In a few hundred years, we will experience changes of comparable magnitude whose origin is not a “normal” biophysical fluctuation, but anthropogenic. Continue reading

When the Ideal Home Tells the Story of Our Societies

by LDV Studio Urbain

Some dream of an apartment bathed in light, a stone’s throw from cafes and bookstores. Others of a house surrounded by greenery, far from the hustle and bustle of the city, with a garden to grow tomatoes and flowers. These ostensibly opposing desires have been running through our societies for centuries and reflect great collective ideas: technical progress, individualism, social equality or a return to nature. Living is not just about housing: it is about choosing a living environment that reflects our values and desires.

Since ancient times, the city has fascinated as much as it repels. For the Greeks and Romans, the city was much more than a place to live: it was the heart of political, cultural and religious life. Aristotle saw in the polis the natural framework of “living together”, where man could fulfill his social nature. At the same time, Plato and Cicero were already criticizing it as a space where diseases and social tensions accumulate. This ambivalence has provided inspiration for many utopias through the ages and still runs through our urban imaginations today. Continue reading

Bruce Bégout: A World Without Ruins

by LDV Studio Urbain

The urban fabric, and architecture in particular, has always been a testament to past societies, and to the way in which the civilizations that came before us lived and were organized. However, after the construction of prestigious ancient works and the ingenious buildings of modernity, it may well be that today’s architecture is an exception. What if our current era of consumerism and industrial capitalism is doomed to no longer produce ruins? This is a question asked by Bruce Bégout in his book Obsolescence des ruines, published in 2022 by Éditions Inculte. Continue reading

The Folly of the New Towns: From Infatuation to Torpor

by LDV Studio Urbain

In recent years, ambitious visions of “new cities” have proliferated across the globe – futuristic urban experiments promising innovation, sustainability and human flourishing. From the high deserts of the American Southwest to the arid plateaus of the Arabian Peninsula, these projects are marketed as bold blueprints of tomorrow’s world: climate-responsive, technologically sophisticated and socially equitable.

But despite their rhetorical appeal and visionary aesthetics, such projects often raise more questions than answers. What lies beneath the allure of these so-called “smart cities”? Who funds them, and to what end? Do they represent genuine models for future urbanism, or are they merely monuments to excess, destined to fade into obsolescence like so many failed utopias before them? Continue reading

Vincent Callebaut: “The Ideal City Doesn’t Exist”

treescraper

The futuristic designs of Belgian architect Vincent Callebaut, whose green buildings strive to reconcile nature and the urban world, are among the most radical and striking visions of a biophilic urban future. The following interview was first published in French in December 2020 on the Fondation Bouygues Immobilier blog Demain la Ville. Continue reading